Brooks (brooksmoses) wrote,
Brooks
brooksmoses

A thought about this bit Macintosh on Intel news.

So, it appears that the latest Apple announcement (that future Macs will use Intel, not IBM, processors, starting in a year or so) is being mentioned in nearly every computer-oriented blog and news source on the planet. Therefore, I can't risk being left behind, and must say something on it.

One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet, though, is this question: How long after OS/X-on-Intel comes out will it take for there to be a Wine-on-OS/X? And, when it does, will it be an GPL'ed Wine product, or will it be an Apple product?

If Apple can produce a MacOS that runs Windows applications, even in a limited way, that would be a very interesting answer to the "there's less software for Mac" and "the software I want to use doesn't run on a Mac" arguments. I don't know whether it will actually be possible, mind -- I don't know how close the hardware architecture needs to be for Wintel applications to run on a non-PC i86 computer, nor how close the Mac architecture will actually be (my guess: not especially), but it's a nice thought.

How about it? Alexei? Eric?

(Yeah, yeah, I know. "It is Apple's policy not to comment on unreleased products.")
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 2 comments